Jon Gudmandsen explores dark pools by looking at the regulators’ approach to their management and raises questions concerning their effect on the efficiency of financial markets, and how MiFID II may address any concerns.
Leon Hurd considers the above question from the perspective of the banker assessing options for disputes arising out of the lending and financial products business
The German retail investors protection act and the english retail distribution review: The early indicators for european investor protection
The German legislator presented a draft for the German Retail Investors Protection Act (the ‘Act’) in July 2014.
According to the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), ‘[t]he trafficking of children for the purpose of domestic service, prostitution and other forms of exploitative labour is a widespread phenomenon in Nigeria’.
John Raymond LaBrosse, Rodrigo Olivares-Caminal and Dalvinder Singh provide some observations on financing arrangements within the the EU’s Bank Resolution Directive
The Indonesian Parliament (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat) passed a bill regarding the country’s flag, language, national emblem, and anthem in 2009. It became Law No. 24 of 2009 on The Flag, the Language, the National Emblem, and the National Anthem (the ‘Law’ or ‘Law No. 24/2009’).
What is MiFID II? - When the original Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MIFID) came into effect on 1 November 2007, policy makers were already planning to review this flagship European financial markets legislation. Fast forward nearly six and a half years and work on MiFID II is entering its final strait. In the intervening years, the financial crisis has given rise to extensive regulatory changes across the globe. MiFID II goes beyond the review foreseen in the original MiFID to address many of the significant weaknesses in firms’ and financial markets’ operations identified during the crisis.
Previous articles in Financial Regulation International have looked at how the Bribery Act 2010 has developed, interpretations of the guidance made under it and firms’ fears for the first prosecution for the offence of failing to prevent bribery.
The regulators and policy makers responsible for the design and implementation of the post-2008 agenda of financial reform are frequently questioned over the slowness and limitations of the process.
Starting 6 August 2014, a new regulation on customer protection in the financial services industry became effective in Indonesia. Regulation No. 1/POJK.07/2013 was issued on 26 July 2013 and enacted on 6 August 2013 (the ‘Regulation’) has been fully effective one year after its enactment to provide guidance for a comprehensive protection for all financial services providers (‘Providers’) which were previously separately regulated by different regulators. The regulation was issued by the newly established Financial Services Authority to implement art 31 (as well as 30) of Law No. 21/2011 regarding Financial Services Authority (Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, ‘OJK’). OJK itself was established to become an ‘umbrella’ organisation for all financial services industry (except for futures industry).
Dr Nicholas Ryder analyses the association between the 2008 global financial crisis and white collar crime, in particular, mortgage fraud
Introduction - This paper provides an insight into the challenges of dealing with corruption. The aim of this article is to highlight that there is no legal definition for corruption that can be identified in any United Nations (UN) Convention, European Union (EU) Treaty, Regulation or Directive or any legislation in the United Kingdom (UK) or United States (US). The origins and soft-law definitions are explored and the notion of corruption solely being associated with public officials or public office is also considered.
A balancing act – The Maltese investment services rules applicable to collective investment schemes authorised to invest through loans
Adrian Cutajar examines the Malta Financial Services Authority’s Investment Services Rules, including their regulatory relevance and the manner in which they address risks associated with specialised investment funds.
In March 2014, Russia had an opportunity to experience the consequences of the latest development in the AML/CFT regime. On 20th March, the US Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated certain Russian and non-Russian citizens pursuant to Executive Order 13661.
EMAIL NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Financial Regulation on Twitter
- PPI - the Saga Continues Learn more about this CPDcast
- Developments in Investment Funds – Part One Learn more about this CPDcast
- Ring-Fencing Under the UK Banking Reform Act 2013 and Possible EU Legislation Learn more about this CPDcast
- New Bail in Proposals in the EU - A Sign of Things to Come? Learn more about this CPDcast
- PRIPS - Seven Years in the Making Learn more about this CPDcast